TISAX (automotive supply chain information security assessment), explained

Last updated:

Key takeaways

  • Confirm your required assessment level with the OEM requesting it, not by guessing.

TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is the information security assessment system most automotive OEMs now expect their suppliers to hold, run by the ENX Association and built on the VDA ISA (Information Security Assessment) questionnaire that the German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA) publishes. Rather than every OEM auditing every supplier separately, TISAX lets a supplier get assessed once and share the resulting label with multiple customers through the ENX Portal — the standard answer, in the automotive supply chain, to "has this vendor's information security actually been checked."

A sourcing note: this guide draws on ENX's own TISAX overview and portal downloads pages (both rendered successfully) for governance, process and catalogue-versioning facts, cross-checked against independent secondary sources (NRI Secure, Schellman) for the AL1-3 and maturity-scale wording, since ENX's own public pages describe these mechanics at a higher level than the secondary sources do. Confirm exact scoring and requirement text against the VDA ISA catalogue itself, available from the ENX Portal, before treating any number below as a final compliance threshold.

What TISAX actually assesses, and why it exists

Per ENX's own page, TISAX "was developed to create a standardized and scalable approach to information security in the automotive industry," covering the protection of "design data, production information, customer information, prototypes, and intellectual property" that flows between OEMs and their supplier base. The scheme is maintained through industry collaboration — ENX states it is "continuously developed by automotive manufacturers, suppliers, and audit providers working together in expert groups and committees" — rather than being a fixed standard an outside body wrote once and left alone. The actual assessment content is the separate VDA ISA catalogue, which ENX describes as serving as the requirements framework for assessments; TISAX itself is the governance, process and label-exchange layer sitting on top of that catalogue.

Four stages, from registration to shared results

ENX's own page describes the process in four stages: registration (defining the assessment's scope — which locations, which protection goals, such as confidentiality of prototypes or protection of personal data), provider selection (choosing an ENX-approved audit provider), assessment (a combination of self-assessment against the VDA ISA questionnaire and, depending on the assessment level, external verification), and exchange of results via the ENX Portal, where the resulting TISAX label is valid for three years and can be securely shared with the specific partner companies the assessed organization selects — it isn't a public certificate list by default.

AL1, AL2, AL3: three levels of scrutiny, not three sets of requirements

The AL1/AL2/AL3 distinction is about how rigorously a given scope is checked, not a different requirements catalogue for each level:

Level What happens Label issued?
AL1 Self-assessment only, against the VDA ISA questionnaire; no external auditor No — used mainly as an internal gap-finding step
AL2 Remote plausibility check: an ENX-approved auditor reviews self-assessment evidence and conducts an interview, typically by video call Yes — most labels in circulation are AL2
AL3 Full on-site audit: evidence review, interviews, and a physical site visit Yes — required for very high protection needs, including every prototype-protection label

A supplier handling unreleased vehicle prototypes or classified OEM data should expect to be pushed toward AL3 by the OEM's own scope requirements regardless of company size, since prototype protection is treated as inherently high-risk rather than negotiable down to AL2.

The 0-5 maturity scale sits underneath the assessment level

Independently of which AL level applies, each individual VDA ISA control gets scored on a capability-maturity scale modeled on CMMI-style process maturity, roughly: 0 (no process exists), 1 (ad-hoc and unstructured), 2 (planned and tracked, with assigned responsibility), 3 ("Established" — a standardized, documented process consistently applied, not just written down), 4 (measured with quantitative metrics), and 5 (subject to continuous, data-driven improvement). The VDA ISA catalogue splits requirements into "must" and "should" categories, and the consistent account across this guide's secondary sources is that an organization's applicable "must" controls generally need to reach at least maturity level 3 without open non-conformities to receive a label — a control scoring below that threshold becomes a documented finding rather than an automatic failure of the whole assessment, but enough open findings can still block the label.

The catalogue itself is changing: ISA 6.0.3 to ISA2027

The detail most worth tracking for anyone commissioning an assessment around this guide's publication date: per ENX's own portal downloads page, the current catalogue, ISA 6.0.3 (dated 2024-04-25), has applied to assessments starting after 1 April 2024. A successor catalogue, ISA2027.1 (dated 2026-07-01), is already published on the same ENX page and is described there as the basis for "TISAX Assessments ordered in 2027." ENX's page states the final date to open an initial assessment under the ISA 6 catalogue is March 2027, after which ISA2027 becomes the sole active version. Independent secondary reporting adds that ISA2027 also drops the old incremental version-numbering convention in favor of year-based naming and moves to an annual summer release cadence — but the commissioning date, not the publication date of whichever catalogue is newest, is what determines which version a given assessment is actually run against. A supplier planning an assessment in late 2026 should confirm with its chosen audit provider whether the order date puts it under ISA 6.0.3 or the incoming ISA2027 catalogue before preparing evidence against the wrong version's control set.

Where this sits next to ISO/IEC 27001 and IEC 62443

TISAX is automotive-sector-specific and runs on its own VDA ISA questionnaire rather than directly certifying against a general ISO management-system standard — it is not the same instrument as ISO/IEC 27001 certification, though organizations that already run an ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS typically find substantial control overlap and can reuse much of that documentation as TISAX evidence. For suppliers whose products are industrial-automation components rather than purely information-security scope, TISAX also doesn't substitute for the IEC 62443 series' own certification schemes (see IEC 62443-4-1 and IEC 62443-4-2) — a supplier selling both into general automotive OEM relationships and into industrial/OT buyers may need to maintain both tracks rather than assuming one covers the other.

A workable starting point

  1. Confirm your required assessment level with the OEM requesting it, not by guessingAL1/AL2/AL3 is set per assessment scope by the customer relationship driving the request, not chosen unilaterally by the supplier.
  2. Run an AL1 self-assessment internally before committing to a paid AL2/AL3 engagementIt's explicitly designed as a no-label, low-cost gap-finding step.
  3. Target maturity level 3 ("Established") on every applicable "must" control, not just documentation that existsThe scale checks whether a process is consistently followed and integrated into normal operations, not merely written down somewhere.
  4. Check your assessment's commissioning date against the ISA 6.0.3 / ISA2027 cutoverWith initial ISA 6 assessments only orderable through March 2027, evidence prepared against the wrong catalogue version wastes audit time.
  5. Don't assume TISAX and ISO/IEC 27001 are interchangeable, even with real control overlap — reuse ISO/IEC 27001 documentation as a starting point for VDA ISA evidence, but map it explicitly rather than submitting it unchanged.

SoftWSP's device and firmware security assessments can supply the technical evidence — vulnerability handling, update and hardening records — that feeds the information-security and prototype-protection controls a VDA ISA assessment checks: see Device & Firmware Security.

This guide draws on ENX's own published TISAX and VDA ISA downloads pages, cross-checked against independent secondary reporting (NRI Secure, Schellman) for assessment-level and maturity-scale wording not described with the same specificity on ENX's own public pages. This guide is not a substitute for the VDA ISA catalogue itself or for compliance/legal advice.

Sources

  1. ENX Association: TISAX overview — governance, VDA ISA basis, process stages, label sharing via the ENX Portal
  2. ENX Portal: Downloads — VDA ISA catalogue versions (ISA 6.0.3, ISA2027.1, redline changes, applicable assessment date ranges)
  3. NRI Secure: What Is TISAX? The Complete Guide to Automotive Information Security Assessments (AL1/AL2/AL3 definitions, 0-5 maturity scale, label validity period)
  4. Schellman: TISAX Self-Assessment Guide (accredited-assessor perspective on the self-assessment and plausibility-check process)

Frequently asked questions

What is TISAX, and who runs it?

TISAX (Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange) is an information security assessment system for the automotive industry, governed by the ENX Association. Per ENX's own page, it "was developed to create a standardized and scalable approach to information security in the automotive industry" and is "continuously developed by automotive manufacturers, suppliers, and audit providers working together in expert groups and committees." The assessment questions themselves come from a separate but linked document: the VDA ISA (Information Security Assessment) catalogue, which ENX maintains and the German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA) publishes.

What do the AL1, AL2 and AL3 assessment levels mean?

They are escalating levels of verification rigor, not escalating sets of requirements. Per ENX and independent secondary reporting, AL1 is self-assessment only, using the VDA ISA questionnaire, with no external auditor and no TISAX label issued — it functions mainly as an internal gap-finding tool before a real assessment. AL2 adds a remote plausibility check: an ENX-approved auditor reviews the self-assessment's supporting evidence and conducts an interview, typically by video call, and does issue a TISAX label; most labels in circulation are AL2. AL3 is a full on-site audit — evidence review, interviews and a physical site visit — reserved for very high protection needs, such as handling classified vehicle data or unreleased prototypes, and this guide's sources describe it as mandatory for every prototype-protection label regardless of the assessed company's size.

How does the 0-5 maturity scale work, and what score do you need to pass?

Separately from the AL1-3 assessment level, each individual VDA ISA control is scored on a capability-maturity scale from 0 to 5, modeled on CMMI-style process maturity: roughly, 0 (no process exists), 1 (ad-hoc, unstructured), 2 (planned and tracked with assigned responsibility), 3 (standardized, documented and consistently applied, called "Established"), 4 (measured with quantitative metrics), and 5 (subject to continuous, data-driven improvement). The VDA ISA catalogue separates requirements into "must" and "should" categories; to receive a TISAX label, an assessed organization's "must" controls generally need to reach at least maturity level 3 without open non-conformities. This guide's secondary sources describe the exact wording and scoring mechanics consistently, but the authoritative requirement text lives in the VDA ISA catalogue itself, available from the ENX Portal — confirm scoring rules there before treating any specific numeric threshold as final.

What is ISA2027, and does it replace the current VDA ISA catalogue?

Yes, on a defined timeline. Per ENX's own portal downloads page, the current catalogue is ISA 6.0.3 (dated 2024-04-25), applicable to assessments starting after 1 April 2024. The VDA published a successor catalogue, ISA2027.1, dated 2026-07-01 on the same ENX downloads page, which the page states will be "the basis of TISAX Assessments ordered in 2027"; assessments ordered before 1 January 2027 can still use ISA 6. ENX's own page further states that the final date to open an initial assessment under the ISA 6 catalogue is March 2027, after which ISA2027 becomes the only active version. A supplier commissioning an assessment now should check which catalogue version its specific order date falls under rather than assume the newest-published catalogue automatically applies.

In this cluster

TISAX (automotive supply chain information security assessment), explained