Key takeaways
- Requirement R2 (Medium VRF) is narrower in scope than R1 — it applies only to high-impact BES Cyber Systems and their associated EACMS and PCA, not PACS and not medium-impact systems.
- Part 3.1 — a paper or active vulnerability assessment "at least once every 15 calendar months," for high- and medium-impact systems and their associated EACMS, PACS and PCA.
- Section 3 (Removable Media): authorize users and locations, and detect and mitigate malicious code on the media using a Cyber Asset other than a BES Cyber System or PCA, before connecting it to one.
- CIP-010-4 is the standard enforced today, but a successor is already locked in.
NERC CIP-010-4, "Cyber Security — Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments," is the mandatory, FERC-approved Reliability Standard that tells utilities and grid operators how to control configuration changes to Bulk Electric System (BES) Cyber Systems and how often to test those systems for vulnerabilities. Per its own Purpose clause it exists "to prevent and detect unauthorized changes to BES Cyber Systems by specifying configuration change management and vulnerability assessment requirements in support of protecting BES Cyber Systems from compromise that could lead to misoperation or instability in the Bulk Electric System (BES)." CIP-010-4 was adopted by the NERC Board of Trustees on 5 November 2020 and approved by FERC on 18 March 2021 — and it remains the enforceable version today, even though a virtualization-focused successor, CIP-010-5, is already FERC-approved for a 2028 compliance date (see below).
Who must comply
Section 4.1 names seven "Responsible Entity" functional types: Balancing Authority, a Distribution Provider that owns specific load-shedding, Remedial Action Scheme, protection or blackstart facilities, Generator Operator, Generator Owner, Reliability Coordinator, Transmission Operator and Transmission Owner. Depending on the specific requirement part, the standard applies to each entity's BES Cyber Systems categorized as high or medium impact under the separate CIP-002 identification process, together with their associated Electronic Access Control or Monitoring Systems (EACMS), Physical Access Control Systems (PACS) and Protected Cyber Assets (PCA) — the standard's own examples of EACMS include "firewalls, authentication servers, and log monitoring and alerting systems."
Five exemption categories (Section 4.2.3) take Cyber Assets out of scope entirely: facilities regulated by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission; communication networks and data links between discrete Electronic Security Perimeters; systems regulated by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission under 10 C.F.R. § 73.54; for Distribution Providers, systems and equipment outside the standard's Section 4.2.1 scope; and any Responsible Entity that identifies it has no high- or medium-impact BES Cyber Systems under CIP-002 at all.
R1: the six-part configuration change management process
Requirement R1 (Violation Risk Factor: Medium) requires one or more documented processes covering six table parts:
| Part | Applies to | Core obligation |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | High/medium impact systems + EACMS, PACS, PCA | Develop a baseline configuration listing: OS/firmware version; installed commercial or open-source application software; any custom software; logical network-accessible ports; and applied security patches |
| 1.2 | Same | Authorize and document any change that deviates from the existing baseline |
| 1.3 | Same | Update the baseline "within 30 calendar days of completing the change" |
| 1.4 | Same | Before the change, determine which CIP-005/CIP-007 security controls it could affect; after the change, verify and document that those controls were not adversely affected |
| 1.5 | High impact only, where technically feasible | Test changes in a test environment (or a carefully managed production test) that models the baseline, before production deployment |
| 1.6 | High/medium impact + EACMS, PACS (for baseline items 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.5) | Verify the identity and integrity of software from its source before the change, when the software source provides a method to do so |
Part 1.6's own note confirms it doesn't require renegotiating existing vendor contracts, and excludes contract terms and vendor performance from its scope — the same carve-out CIP-013's supply chain standard uses (see NERC CIP-013-2).
R2: configuration monitoring catches changes that bypassed the process
Requirement R2 (Medium VRF) is narrower in scope than R1 — it applies only to high-impact BES Cyber Systems and their associated EACMS and PCA, not PACS and not medium-impact systems. Its single table part, 2.1, requires monitoring "at least once every 35 calendar days for changes to the baseline configuration," with any detected unauthorized change documented and investigated. Where R1 governs changes made through the authorized process, R2 is the control that is meant to catch changes that happened outside it.
R3: vulnerability assessments on a fixed calendar, not just "periodically"
Requirement R3 (Medium VRF) sets concrete, numeric cadences rather than a general "regularly" obligation:
- Part 3.1 — a paper or active vulnerability assessment "at least once every 15 calendar months," for high- and medium-impact systems and their associated EACMS, PACS and PCA.
- Part 3.2 — for high-impact systems only, where technically feasible, an active vulnerability assessment "at least once every 36 calendar months," performed in a test environment (or a production test run in a way that minimizes adverse effects) that models the production baseline.
- Part 3.3 — before adding a new applicable Cyber Asset to production, an active vulnerability assessment of that asset, with exceptions for CIP Exceptional Circumstances and like-for-like replacements modeling an existing baseline.
- Part 3.4 — documenting assessment results and an action plan to remediate or mitigate identified vulnerabilities, including a planned completion date and execution status.
The standard's own Violation Severity Level table shows how closely these deadlines are enforced: a Part 3.1 assessment more than 15 but less than 18 months since the last one is a Lower violation; 18-21 months is Moderate; 21-24 months is High; and beyond 24 months is Severe. Part 3.2's 36-month active assessment cadence escalates on the same pattern, at 36-39, 39-42, 42-45 and beyond-45-month bands.
R4: Transient Cyber Assets and Removable Media
Requirement R4 (Medium VRF) requires a documented plan, built from Attachment 1, for every Transient Cyber Asset and piece of Removable Media connected to high- or medium-impact BES Cyber Systems and associated PCA — laptops, diagnostic tools and USB media a vendor or technician brings on-site, not systems permanently part of the environment:
- Section 1 (assets the Responsible Entity manages): authorize users, locations and uses; mitigate software vulnerabilities (patching, read-only boot media, hardening, or another method); mitigate introduction of malicious code (antivirus, application whitelisting, or another method); and mitigate unauthorized use (physical access restriction, full-disk encryption, multi-factor authentication, or another method).
- Section 2 (assets a third party manages): a lighter, review-based version of the same two mitigation objectives — reviewing the other party's patching and anti-malware practices rather than directly controlling the asset — plus a requirement to determine and implement any additional mitigations needed before connecting it.
- Section 3 (Removable Media): authorize users and locations, and detect and mitigate malicious code on the media using a Cyber Asset other than a BES Cyber System or PCA, before connecting it to one.
Evidence for every R1-R4 requirement must be retained for three calendar years, per the standard's Compliance section, and the standard carries no Regional Variances.
CIP-010-5 is already approved — the 2028 compliance clock is running
CIP-010-4 is the standard enforced today, but a successor is already locked in. On 19 March 2026 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued Order No. 919 (Docket No. RM24-8-000), stating it "approves 11 modified Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Reliability Standards" and explicitly listing "CIP-010-5 (Cyber Security — Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments)" alongside CIP-002-7, CIP-003-10, CIP-004-8, CIP-005-8, CIP-006-7.1, CIP-007-7.1, CIP-008-7.1, CIP-009-7.1, CIP-011-4.1 and CIP-013-3 — published in the Federal Register on 24 March 2026 at 91 FR 13957, with the order stating "this final rule is effective May 26, 2026." The package also approves four new NERC Glossary definitions — Cyber System, Management Interface, Shared Cyber Infrastructure and Virtual Cyber Asset — needed to let the CIP suite apply cleanly to virtualized infrastructure, plus 18 revised definitions. Order No. 919 separately approved replacing most "technical feasibility exception" language with a self-implementing "per system capability" standard, after NERC reported a significant decrease in submitted technical feasibility exceptions under the prior wording.
Per NERC's own implementation plan, quoted directly in the order, the revised standards "will become effective on the later of April 1, 2026, or the first day of the first calendar quarter that is 24 months after the effective date of the applicable governmental authority's order" — which, from the order's 26 May 2026 effective date, computes to 1 July 2028. Responsible entities may elect early adoption at six, 12 or 18 months after that date instead of waiting for the mandatory date. NERC's final draft of CIP-010-5 (April 2024) extends Applicability and exemption language from discrete "Cyber Assets" to the broader "Cyber Systems" concept, to accommodate Shared Cyber Infrastructure hosting virtual machines for multiple BES Cyber Systems — this guide has not independently reviewed every redlined Requirement part, so treat the exact wording changes to R1-R4 as something to confirm against NERC's and FERC's own published CIP-010-5 text before compliance planning.
A workable starting point
Build the baseline before anything elsePart 1.1's five items — OS/firmware version, commercial/open-source software, custom software, logical ports, and applied patches — are what every other R1 and R2 obligation measures a change against; an incomplete baseline (the standard's own Violation Severity Levels penalize baselines missing even one of the five items) undermines the rest of the process. Separate the R1 change-authorization process from the R2 monitoring processR1 Part 1.2 governs changes made through your process; R2 Part 2.1 (high-impact systems only, every 35 days) is the independent check that catches changes made outside it — treat them as two controls, not one. Put R3's assessment cadences on a calendar with margin, not a countdown. The Violation Severity Levels for Part 3.1 escalate starting at 15 months and for Part 3.2 starting at 36 months — a vulnerability assessment program with no scheduling buffer has no slack if an assessment slips. Treat vendor and contractor equipment as Transient Cyber Assets from day oneR4's Section 2 controls for third-party-managed assets are lighter than Section 1's, but they are not optional — a contractor's diagnostic laptop connecting to a BES Cyber System needs documented mitigation review even when the Responsible Entity doesn't own or directly manage it. Start tracking CIP-010-5 even though it isn't enforceable yetWith a FERC-approved 1 July 2028 compliance date already set, entities planning virtualized or shared infrastructure for BES Cyber Systems should evaluate the new Cyber System, Shared Cyber Infrastructure and Management Interface concepts now rather than retrofitting baselines and vulnerability assessment processes after the fact.
SoftWSP's OT asset and firmware assessments can help build and verify the baseline configuration and vulnerability-assessment evidence CIP-010 requires, including for Transient Cyber Assets brought on-site by vendors: see OT Snapshot.
This guide quotes NERC's own published text of CIP-010-4 and the CIP-010-5 final draft, and the Federal Register text of FERC Order No. 919; it is not a substitute for the full standards, NERC's Implementation Plan, or compliance/legal advice. CIP-010-4 remains the enforceable standard as of this guide's publication — CIP-010-5 is approved but not yet mandatory.
Sources
- NERC: CIP-010-4 — Cyber Security – Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments (currently effective standard, full text: Purpose, Applicability, Requirements R1-R4 with Tables, Attachment 1, Compliance, Violation Severity Levels, Version History)
- NERC: CIP-010-5 — Final Draft (April 2024), Cyber Security – Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments (redline vs. CIP-010-4, Standard Development Timeline)
- Federal Register: Order No. 919; Virtualization Reliability Standards, 91 FR 13957-13965 (FERC, Docket No. RM24-8-000, issued 2026-03-19, published 2026-03-24, effective 2026-05-26) — lists CIP-010-5 among the 11 approved standards
Frequently asked questions
What is NERC CIP-010-4, and who must comply?
CIP-010, "Cyber Security — Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments," is a mandatory, FERC-approved Reliability Standard from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). Per its own Purpose statement, it exists "to prevent and detect unauthorized changes to BES Cyber Systems by specifying configuration change management and vulnerability assessment requirements in support of protecting BES Cyber Systems from compromise that could lead to misoperation or instability in the Bulk Electric System (BES)." The currently enforceable version, CIP-010-4, was adopted by the NERC Board of Trustees on 5 November 2020 and approved by FERC on 18 March 2021 (Docket No. RD21-2-000). Section 4.1 names seven "Responsible Entity" functional types — Balancing Authority, certain Distribution Providers, Generator Operator, Generator Owner, Reliability Coordinator, Transmission Operator and Transmission Owner — and the requirements apply to each entity's BES Cyber Systems categorized as high or medium impact under CIP-002, plus their associated Electronic Access Control or Monitoring Systems (EACMS), Physical Access Control Systems (PACS) and Protected Cyber Assets (PCA), depending on the specific requirement part.
What do Requirements R1 and R2 (configuration change management and monitoring) require?
R1 (Table R1 — Configuration Change Management, Violation Risk Factor Medium) has six parts: Part 1.1 requires a documented baseline configuration per Cyber Asset covering operating system/firmware version, installed commercial or open-source application software, custom software, logical network-accessible ports, and applied security patches. Part 1.2 requires authorizing and documenting any change that deviates from that baseline. Part 1.3 requires updating the baseline "within 30 calendar days of completing the change." Part 1.4 requires determining which CIP-005/CIP-007 security controls a change could affect, verifying after the change that those controls were not adversely affected, and documenting the verification. Part 1.5 (high-impact systems only, where technically feasible) requires testing changes in a test environment — or a production environment tested in a way that minimizes adverse effects — before deployment. Part 1.6 requires verifying the identity and integrity of software from its source before a baseline change, when the software source makes that verification method available. R2 (Table R2 — Configuration Monitoring, also Medium VRF) applies only to high-impact systems and their associated EACMS/PCA, and requires monitoring for unauthorized baseline changes "at least once every 35 calendar days," with any detected unauthorized change documented and investigated.
What do Requirements R3 (vulnerability assessments) and R4 (Transient Cyber Assets) require?
R3 (Table R3 — Vulnerability Assessments, Medium VRF) requires, per Part 3.1, a paper or active vulnerability assessment "at least once every 15 calendar months" for high- and medium-impact systems and their associated EACMS/PACS/PCA. Part 3.2 adds, for high-impact systems only and where technically feasible, an active vulnerability assessment "at least once every 36 calendar months" performed in a test environment (or a carefully managed production test) that models the production baseline. Part 3.3 requires an active vulnerability assessment of any new applicable Cyber Asset before it joins production, with exceptions for CIP Exceptional Circumstances and like-for-like replacements. Part 3.4 requires documenting assessment results and an action plan to remediate or mitigate identified vulnerabilities, including planned completion dates and execution status. R4 (Medium VRF) requires a documented Transient Cyber Asset and Removable Media plan, per the standard's Attachment 1, covering management, authorization (users, locations, uses), software-vulnerability mitigation, malicious-code mitigation and unauthorized-use mitigation for transient assets the Responsible Entity manages, a parallel but lighter review-based set of controls for transient assets managed by other parties, and malicious-code detection/mitigation for removable media before it connects to a BES Cyber System.
Is CIP-010-4 already being replaced, and by when do entities need to comply with the next version?
Yes — a successor, CIP-010-5, is already FERC-approved, though CIP-010-4 remains the enforceable standard today. On 19 March 2026 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued Order No. 919 (Docket No. RM24-8-000), stating it "approves 11 modified Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Reliability Standards" that explicitly include "CIP-010-5 (Cyber Security — Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments)" as part of NERC's Project 2016-02 virtualization package — published in the Federal Register on 24 March 2026 (91 FR 13957-13965) with the order itself stating "this final rule is effective May 26, 2026." Per NERC's own implementation plan, quoted directly in the order, the revised standards "will become effective on the later of April 1, 2026, or the first day of the first calendar quarter that is 24 months after the effective date of the applicable governmental authority's order" — which computes to **1 July 2028** from the 26 May 2026 order effective date. Responsible entities may elect early adoption at six, 12 or 18 months after that date instead of waiting for the mandatory compliance date.
What does the CIP-010-5 revision change?
CIP-010-5 is part of the same NERC Project 2016-02 virtualization package behind CIP-005-8 and nine other revised CIP standards that Order No. 919 approved together, alongside four new NERC Glossary definitions (Cyber System, Management Interface, Shared Cyber Infrastructure and Virtual Cyber Asset) and 18 revised definitions. NERC's final draft of CIP-010-5 (April 2024) extends the standard's Applicability and exemption language to the new "Cyber Systems" concept rather than only discrete physical "Cyber Assets," to accommodate Shared Cyber Infrastructure (SCI) that hosts virtual machines for multiple BES Cyber Systems. Order No. 919 also approved replacing most "technical feasibility exception" language across the CIP suite with a self-implementing "per system capability" standard, which NERC said would ease the administrative burden of the prior exception-filing process. This guide has not independently reviewed every redlined Part of the final CIP-010-5 text; treat any claim about exactly which R1-R4 Parts change wording as something to confirm against NERC's and FERC's own published CIP-010-5 text before relying on it for compliance planning.
In this cluster


