CRA Annex III and IV: important and critical products with digital elements, explained

Last updated:

Key takeaways

  • Not every product under the Cyber Resilience Act faces the same compliance route.
  • Article 7(1) sets the basic test: a product is classified by its own core functionality, not by what it contains.
  • Annex III and IV name categories in plain language, but plenty of products sit near a boundary — does a smartphone's built-in password manager make the phone an "important product"?
  • Check core functionality first, not component inventory.

Not every product under the Cyber Resilience Act faces the same compliance route. Most fall into a default tier and can self-assess against Annex I. But if a product's core functionality matches one of the categories in Annex III, it is an important product with digital elements (split into Class I and the stricter Class II); if it matches one of the three categories in Annex IV, it is a critical product with digital elements facing the toughest conformity route of all. Getting this classification right matters because it decides whether you can self-assess, need a notified body, or need a formal EU cybersecurity certificate.

A note on sourcing: this guide's research fetch could not directly render the EUR-Lex pages for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 or Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392 (both returned an empty response rather than rendering the page text). The Annex III/IV category lists and article summaries below are cross-checked against InsideCRA, a dedicated CRA reference site that reproduces the regulation's annexes and articles in full, and against independent secondary reporting (TÜV, legal-tracker summaries of the November 2025 implementing regulation). EU legislation is public-domain/CC BY-reusable per the Commission's standard reuse policy; treat any clause number below as a starting point to re-verify against EUR-Lex's own text before citing it in a compliance submission.

Three tiers, one Article 7(1) rule

Article 7(1) sets the basic test: a product is classified by its own core functionality, not by what it contains. A VPN feature bundled into a broader business application does not turn that whole application into an "important" VPN product — only a product whose core purpose is to provide VPN functionality falls under that Annex III category. The same logic applies throughout: integrating an important or critical component into a larger product does not, by itself, pull the larger product into that stricter tier.

Article 7(2) gives the two criteria a category must meet to belong in Annex III at all: (a) the product primarily performs functions critical to the cybersecurity of other products, networks or services — securing authentication and access, intrusion prevention and detection, endpoint security, or network protection; or (b) it performs a function carrying a significant risk of adverse effects through direct manipulation, such as a central system function like network management, configuration control, virtualisation, or processing of personal data. Article 8 layers on extra criteria for critical products in Annex IV, including whether essential entities under the NIS2 Directive depend on the product and whether it risks disrupting critical supply chains.

Annex III Class I — 19 categories

Per the regulation's own text, Class I covers:

  1. Identity management systems and privileged access management software and hardware, including authentication and access control readers (including biometric readers)
  2. Standalone and embedded browsers
  3. Password managers
  4. Software that searches for, removes or quarantines malicious software
  5. Products with digital elements with the function of virtual private network (VPN)
  6. Network management systems
  7. Security information and event management (SIEM) systems
  8. Boot managers
  9. Public key infrastructure and digital certificate issuance software
  10. Physical and virtual network interfaces
  11. Operating systems
  12. Routers, modems intended for the connection to the internet, and switches
  13. Microprocessors with security-related functionalities
  14. Microcontrollers with security-related functionalities
  15. Application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) and field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) with security-related functionalities
  16. Smart home general-purpose virtual assistants
  17. Smart home products with security functionalities, including smart door locks, security cameras, baby monitoring systems and alarm systems
  18. Internet-connected toys with social-interactive features or location-tracking features
  19. Personal wearable products with a health-monitoring purpose, or that are intended for use by children, where Regulation (EU) 2017/745 or (EU) 2017/746 (the medical devices regulations) do not already apply

Annex III Class II and Annex IV — the higher tiers

Class II, reserved for important products the recitals describe as carrying greater potential impact if compromised, lists 4 categories: hypervisors and container runtime systems that support virtualised execution of operating systems and similar environments; firewalls and intrusion detection/prevention systems; tamper-resistant microprocessors; and tamper-resistant microcontrollers.

Annex IV, the critical tier, is the shortest list of all — just 3 categories: hardware devices with security boxes (hardware security modules); smart meter gateways within smart metering systems and other devices for advanced security purposes, including secure cryptoprocessing; and smartcards or similar devices, including secure elements.

Tier Example categories Default conformity route
Default (not in Annex III/IV) Most products with digital elements Module A: manufacturer self-assessment
Important, Class I Browsers, password managers, VPN products, routers/modems/switches, smart home security devices Module A only if fully applying harmonised standards/common specifications/a certification scheme at "substantial"; otherwise Module B+C or H with a notified body
Important, Class II Hypervisors, firewalls/IDS/IPS, tamper-resistant microprocessors/microcontrollers Always third-party: Module B+C, Module H, or a certification scheme at "substantial"
Critical (Annex IV) Hardware security modules, smart meter gateways, smartcards/secure elements Commission may require a European cybersecurity certificate at least "substantial" under Article 8 — see our guide to the EUCC, one scheme that can fill that role

Where the exact boundaries come from: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392

Annex III and IV name categories in plain language, but plenty of products sit near a boundary — does a smartphone's built-in password manager make the phone an "important product"? Article 7(4) required the Commission to settle questions like that by adopting an implementing act with precise technical descriptions, due 11 December 2025. The Commission met that deadline on 28 November 2025, adopting Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392; it was published in the Official Journal on 1 December 2025 and has applied since 21 December 2025. Its own Annex I gives the technical descriptions for important-product categories and its Annex II for critical-product categories — manufacturers near a classification boundary should check that text, not just the category names in Annex III/IV themselves. The CRA also lets the Commission amend Annex III or IV later by delegated act — adding a category, moving one between Class I and Class II, or withdrawing one — so this classification is not expected to stay static over the regulation's lifetime.

A workable starting point

  1. Check core functionality first, not component inventoryArticle 7(1)'s rule means you classify by what your product's core purpose is, not by every security-relevant library or feature it happens to bundle.
  2. Read Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392 before assuming a category appliesThe technical descriptions in its own Annex I/II, not the short Annex III/IV category names, are what actually settle edge cases.
  3. Plan for a notified body early if you land in Class II or Annex IVUnlike default or most Class I products, these routes require third-party involvement; notified-body capacity and lead times are a real planning constraint, not a formality.
  4. Revisit your classification when the Commission amends Annex III/IVThe delegated-act mechanism means today's "default" product could later be added to Annex III — don't treat this as a one-time check.

SoftWSP's firmware security work can help work out whether your product falls under Annex III or IV and what that means for your conformity assessment route: see Device & Firmware Security.

This guide summarises Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392 as reflected in secondary CRA reference sources; it is not a substitute for the regulations' own text on EUR-Lex or for legal advice, and classification decisions should be confirmed against the current official text before being relied on in a conformity assessment.

Sources

  1. Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (Cyber Resilience Act), Articles 7, 8 and 32, and Annexes III and IV, Official Journal text, EUR-Lex
  2. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392 of 28 November 2025 on the technical description of the categories of important and critical products with digital elements, EUR-Lex
  3. European Commission: Cyber Resilience Act, summary of the legal text
  4. InsideCRA: Annex III — Important products with digital elements (article-by-article CRA reference reproducing the regulation's annex text)
  5. InsideCRA: Annex IV — Critical products with digital elements
  6. TÜV: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392 on the technical description of important and critical product categories

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a 'default', 'important' and 'critical' product under the CRA?

The Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/2847) sorts products with digital elements into three conformity-assessment tiers. Most products are 'default': the manufacturer can self-assess against Annex I (Module A, internal control). A product whose core functionality matches one of the categories listed in Annex III is 'important', split into Class I and Class II. A product whose core functionality matches one of the three categories in Annex IV is 'critical'. Per Article 7(1), only a product's own core functionality triggers reclassification — integrating a component that has important-product functionality (for example, a VPN feature inside a larger business application) does not by itself make the whole product 'important'.

What products are in Annex III Class I and Class II?

Annex III Class I lists 19 categories, including identity management and privileged access management software/hardware, standalone and embedded browsers, password managers, anti-malware software, VPN products, network management systems, SIEM systems, boot managers, PKI and digital-certificate-issuance software, physical and virtual network interfaces, operating systems, routers/modems/switches for internet connection, security-related microprocessors and microcontrollers, security-related ASICs/FPGAs, smart home virtual assistants, smart home security products (smart locks, security cameras, baby monitors, alarms), internet-connected toys with interactive or location-tracking features, and child-use or health-monitoring wearables. Annex III Class II lists 4 categories considered higher-risk: hypervisors and container runtime systems, firewalls/intrusion detection and prevention systems, and tamper-resistant microprocessors and microcontrollers.

What makes a product 'critical' under Annex IV, and how is that different from 'important'?

Annex IV lists only three categories: hardware devices with security boxes (hardware security modules), smart meter gateways and other devices for advanced security purposes including secure cryptoprocessing, and smartcards or similar devices including secure elements. Under Article 8, critical products face the strictest route: the Commission may require a European cybersecurity certificate at an assurance level of at least 'substantial' under an EU scheme such as the EUCC, rather than the self-assessment or notified-body options available to most important products.

Where are the exact technical boundaries of each Annex III/IV category defined?

Article 7(4) required the Commission to adopt, by 11 December 2025, an implementing act giving precise technical descriptions of the Annex III and IV categories. The Commission adopted that act, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392, on 28 November 2025; it was published in the Official Journal on 1 December 2025 and has applied since 21 December 2025. It sets out the technical descriptions in its own Annex I (important products) and Annex II (critical products) and is the instrument to check for edge cases — for example, whether a given device's security feature is incidental or core to its function.

In this cluster

CRA Annex III and IV: important and critical products with digital elements, explained