CRA declaration of conformity and technical documentation, explained

Last updated:

Key takeaways

  • The Cyber Resilience Act doesn't just set cybersecurity requirements — it tells manufacturers exactly what paperwork proves those requirements were met.
  • Annex VII, read with Article 31, is the more operationally demanding of the two.
  • Per Article 71 and confirmed directly on the Commission's own summary page, the Regulation entered into force on 10 December 2024, twenty days after its 20 November 2024 Official Journal publication.

The Cyber Resilience Act doesn't just set cybersecurity requirements — it tells manufacturers exactly what paperwork proves those requirements were met. Annex V (and the simplified Annex VI) define the template for the EU declaration of conformity; Annex VII defines what the technical documentation behind it must contain, including an explicit software-bill-of-materials requirement; and Annex VIII sets out which of three conformity assessment modules — self-assessment, notified-body type examination, or full quality assurance — a given product must go through before that declaration can be signed.

How many CRA annexes are there, and which ones cover this paperwork?

Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 has eight annexes in total — a count worth getting right, since earlier guidance (including other CRA explainers on this site covering Annex I's essential requirements, Annex II's user-information requirements, and Annex III/IV's important/critical product classifications) sometimes stops short of the full structure. Annex V is the full EU declaration of conformity template; Annex VI is a simplified version available only in the narrower cases Article 13(20) describes; Annex VII is the content of the technical documentation; and Annex VIII sets out the conformity assessment procedures (Modules A, B+C and H). The European Commission's own CRA summary page confirms this split directly, describing Annexes V and VI as providing "the model structure for such declaration, including a simplified version," with separate headed sections for "Technical Documentation (Annex VII)" and "Conformity Assessment Procedures (Annex VIII)."

What goes into the EU declaration of conformity?

Under Article 28 and the Annex V model, the declaration of conformity must identify the product (name, type and other identifying information); name and address the manufacturer or its authorised representative; state that it is issued under the sole responsibility of the provider; describe the object of the declaration with enough detail to trace it back to the specific product (optionally including a photograph); declare conformity with the relevant Union harmonisation legislation; cite any harmonised standards, common specifications or certifications relied on; where a notified body was involved, name it and describe the assessment procedure and certificate number used; and close with a signature block. Article 28 ties this directly back to Annex VIII, requiring the declaration to "contain the elements specified in the relevant conformity assessment procedures" — so the declaration's exact content depends on which module a product went through. The simplified Annex VI version exists specifically for the Article 13(20) cases and is not a general shortcut available to every manufacturer.

What has to be in the technical documentation?

Annex VII, read with Article 31, is the more operationally demanding of the two. It requires: a general product description (intended purpose, which software versions affect compliance, external-feature photos or diagrams, and the Annex II user information); design, development and production information — including, explicitly, "the software bill of materials" and "the coordinated vulnerability disclosure policy" as required elements of the vulnerability-handling documentation, alongside production and monitoring process validation; the cybersecurity risk assessment required under Annex I; the stated basis for the manufacturer's determined support period under Article 13(8); the harmonised standards or alternative specifications applied; test reports; a copy of the declaration of conformity itself; and the SBOM, to be handed over on a market surveillance authority's reasoned request rather than published by default. The underlying SBOM format requirement — "a commonly used and machine-readable format covering at the very least the top-level dependencies" — is actually set in Annex I, Part II(1), not Annex VII, with Article 13(24) reserving the Commission's right to pin down the exact format later through an implementing act. Our guides to SBOM minimum elements and firmware SBOM cover what building that artifact actually involves for an embedded device.

Which conformity assessment module (Annex VIII) applies?

Annex VIII defines three modules — Module A (internal control: the manufacturer self-assesses and self-declares), Module B+C (EU-type examination by a notified body, followed by conformity-to-type via internal production control) and Module H (full quality assurance, where a notified body assesses the manufacturer's quality management system as a whole) — and Article 32 routes a given product to one of them based on its Annex III/IV risk tier. Most "default" products can self-assess under Module A. "Important" products (Annex III, Class I and Class II) generally need B+C or H, or an equivalent certification scheme, rather than self-declaration alone. "Critical" products (Annex IV) require either a certification scheme or a specified fallback procedure. There is one narrower carve-out: free and open-source software manufacturers of important-tier software may self-assess if their technical documentation is made public — a point our guide to CRA open-source software steward obligations covers in more detail, since "open-source steward" obligations under the CRA are a separate category from this manufacturer-facing conformity-assessment question.

What are the actual deadlines?

Per Article 71 and confirmed directly on the Commission's own summary page, the Regulation entered into force on 10 December 2024, twenty days after its 20 November 2024 Official Journal publication. From there, three dates matter in sequence: Article 14's active-exploitation and severe-incident reporting obligations apply from 11 September 2026; Chapter IV's notified-body designation provisions apply from 11 June 2026; and the Regulation's general provisions — including the Annex V/VI declaration of conformity, Annex VII technical documentation and CE-marking requirements this guide covers — apply from 11 December 2027. The Commission states this plainly: "Its main provisions will start applying from 11 December 2027," naming Article 14 and Chapter IV as the only earlier exceptions. For most device makers, that means the reporting obligation is already live, while the full declaration-of-conformity and technical-documentation paperwork has a longer runway — one best used now rather than in late 2027, since both the SBOM and the vulnerability-handling documentation Annex VII requires take real engineering time to produce accurately from an existing product line.

SoftWSP's device and firmware security assessments generate the SBOM and the vulnerability-handling evidence that Annex VII's technical documentation requires directly from a firmware image, so that documentation reflects what a device actually runs rather than what a build spec says it should run. See device & firmware security services for how that fits into CRA preparation ahead of the 2027 deadline.

This guide is based on Regulation (EU) 2024/2847's own text (Articles 13, 14, 28, 31, 32 and 71, and Annexes I and V through VIII) and the European Commission's own CRA summary and implementation-timeline pages, cross-checked against each other; EUR-Lex's own page returned an empty response to automated fetching during this guide's research, so the annex and article text above should be re-verified against eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2847/oj directly before citing a specific clause in a compliance submission. This guide does not constitute legal advice.

Sources

  1. Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (Cyber Resilience Act): full text, Articles 13, 14, 28, 31, 32, 71 and Annexes I, V, VI, VII, VIII, Official Journal, EUR-Lex
  2. European Commission: Cyber Resilience Act, summary of the legal text (declaration of conformity, technical documentation, conformity assessment procedures, application dates)
  3. European Commission: Cyber Resilience Act implementation timeline
  4. European Commission: Cyber Resilience Act — guidance for manufacturers

Frequently asked questions

How many annexes does the Cyber Resilience Act have, and which ones cover conformity paperwork?

Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (the Cyber Resilience Act) has eight annexes. Annex I sets the essential cybersecurity requirements, Annex II covers information and instructions for the user, Annex III and Annex IV list important and critical products with digital elements, and the conformity-paperwork annexes this guide covers are Annex V (the full EU declaration of conformity template), Annex VI (a simplified declaration template for the cases Article 13(20) allows), Annex VII (content of the technical documentation) and Annex VIII (conformity assessment procedures — Modules A, B+C and H). The European Commission's own CRA summary page confirms this split directly: 'Annexes V and VI provide the model structure for such declaration, including a simplified version,' with separate sections headed 'Technical Documentation (Annex VII)' and 'Conformity Assessment Procedures (Annex VIII).'

What must the EU declaration of conformity (Annex V) actually contain?

Per Article 28 and the Annex V model, the declaration must identify the product by name, type and other identification information; name and address the manufacturer (or its authorised representative); state that the declaration is issued under the sole responsibility of the provider; describe the object of the declaration with enough traceability to identify the product (a photograph may be included); state conformity with the relevant Union harmonisation legislation; reference any harmonised standards, common specifications or certifications relied on; where applicable, name the notified body involved, describe the conformity assessment procedure used and give the certificate number; and close with a signature block (place, date, signatory name, function and signature). Article 28 also requires the declaration to 'contain the elements specified in the relevant conformity assessment procedures set out in Annex VIII.' The simplified Annex VI version is available only for the narrower cases listed in Article 13(20).

What must the technical documentation (Annex VII) contain?

Per Article 31 and Annex VII, the technical documentation must contain, as applicable: a general description of the product (intended purpose, the software versions affecting compliance, photographs or illustrations of external features, and the Annex II user information); design, development and production information, explicitly including 'the software bill of materials' and 'the coordinated vulnerability disclosure policy' as part of the required vulnerability-handling process documentation; the cybersecurity risk assessment carried out under Annex I; the basis for the support period the manufacturer has determined under Article 13(8); the harmonised standards or alternative specifications applied; test reports; a copy of the EU declaration of conformity; and the SBOM itself, to be produced on a market surveillance authority's reasoned request. The SBOM's format requirement — 'a commonly used and machine-readable format covering at the very least the top-level dependencies' — actually sits in Annex I Part II(1), with Article 13(24) giving the Commission power to specify the exact SBOM format through a future implementing act, and the term itself defined in Article 3(39).

Which conformity assessment module applies to my product — Module A, B+C, or H?

Annex VIII defines three modules: Module A (internal control — the manufacturer self-assesses and self-declares), the combination of Module B (EU-type examination, performed by a notified body) with Module C (conformity to that type, via internal production control), and Module H (full quality assurance, assessed by a notified body against the manufacturer's full quality management system). Article 32 routes products to a module by risk tier: most 'default' products may self-assess under Module A; 'important' products with digital elements (Annex III, Class I and Class II) generally require B+C or H, or a recognised certification scheme, rather than self-assessment; 'critical' products (Annex IV) require a certification scheme or an explicit fallback procedure rather than a notified-body route alone. Free and open-source software manufacturers of important-product-tier software may self-assess if their technical documentation is made public, a narrower carve-out covered in more depth in our guide to [CRA open-source software steward obligations](/guides/cra-open-source-software-steward-obligations/).

What are the actual compliance dates for this paperwork?

Per Article 71 (entry into force and application) and confirmed directly on the European Commission's own CRA summary page: the Regulation entered into force on 10 December 2024 (20 days after its 20 November 2024 Official Journal publication); Article 14's reporting obligations for actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents apply from 11 September 2026; Chapter IV's provisions on notified-body designation apply from 11 June 2026; and the Regulation's main provisions — including the Annex V/VI declaration of conformity, Annex VII technical documentation and CE marking requirements covered in this guide — apply generally from 11 December 2027. The Commission's summary states this directly: 'Its main provisions will start applying from 11 December 2027,' with Article 14 and Chapter IV named as the two earlier exceptions.

In this cluster

CRA declaration of conformity and technical documentation, explained