JC-STAR (Japan IoT security labeling), explained

Last updated:

Key takeaways

  • IPA's own program page lays out four conformance tiers.
  • IPA began accepting STAR-1 applications on 25 March 2025, a date given on IPA's own page and corroborated independently by METI's official press release announcing the scheme's launch.
  • JC-STAR is not described, in either IPA's or METI's own materials, as a blanket legal product-safety mandate the way the EU's Cyber Resilience Act is for the products it covers.
  • The detail most worth tracking going into 2027 is that JC-STAR stopped being a purely domestic scheme in 2026.

JC-STAR — the "Labeling Scheme based on Japan Cyber-Security Technical Assessment Requirements" — is Japan's conformity-labeling program for IoT products, run by the Information-technology Promotion Agency (IPA) under a policy METI published in August 2024. It joins a growing family of national IoT device-labeling schemes alongside the UK's PSTI regime, Singapore's Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme (CLS), and the ioXt Alliance pledge — and, as of 2026, it has started actively cross-recognizing some of them rather than existing as a fully separate island.

A sourcing note: this guide's facts come from IPA's own English-language program page and METI's official launch press release (both rendered successfully), cross-checked against independent secondary reporting (Foresight, IoT M2M Council) for the STAR-3 rollout and international mutual-recognition details, which were not found stated with the same specificity on IPA's own English page at the time of this guide's research.

Four levels, two assessment methods

IPA's own program page lays out four conformance tiers. STAR-1 is a unified, baseline set of requirements addressing minimum threats common to all in-scope IoT products — explicitly built to harmonize with international baselines like ETSI EN 303 645 and NIST's NISTIR 8425, rather than reinvent a Japan-only requirement set from scratch. STAR-2 adds category-specific requirements on top of STAR-1 for particular product types. Both STAR-1 and STAR-2 run on vendor self-declaration: IPA grants the conformance label based on a checklist describing the results of the vendor's own self-assessment against the scheme's published requirements and assessment procedures, rather than an independent audit.

STAR-3 and STAR-4 step up to mandatory third-party evaluation, aimed at products headed for government and critical-infrastructure procurement. Per secondary reporting, IPA published STAR-3's concrete requirements on 12 June 2026, initially scoped to two priority categories developed through METI/IPA working groups: network devices (such as routers) and network cameras — the same categories most often named in critical-infrastructure and government-network risk discussions. STAR-4 remained under development as of this guide's research; treat its scope and timeline as unconfirmed until IPA publishes it directly.

Applications opened 25 March 2025

IPA began accepting STAR-1 applications on 25 March 2025, a date given on IPA's own page and corroborated independently by METI's official press release announcing the scheme's launch. Secondary reporting adds operational detail IPA's English page does not spell out as plainly: a discounted STAR-1 application fee (110,000 JPY) was available through 30 September 2025, labels are valid for up to two years, and — as of this guide's research — applications must still be submitted in Japanese, meaning a non-Japanese manufacturer needs either in-house Japanese documentation capability or a local partner to apply, not just an English translation of its own security claims.

A voluntary scheme with a procurement lever

JC-STAR is not described, in either IPA's or METI's own materials, as a blanket legal product-safety mandate the way the EU's Cyber Resilience Act is for the products it covers. Its practical pull instead comes from government procurement: secondary reporting indicates Japan intends to require JC-STAR labeling in government IoT purchases, starting with STAR-1 and moving toward higher levels as the STAR-2/3/4 requirement sets mature and stabilize. A manufacturer with no interest in Japanese public-sector sales is not confirmed to face a direct legal obligation to hold a label — but the same dynamic that made the UK's PSTI mark and Singapore's CLS label commercially relevant beyond their formal legal scope (retailer and enterprise-buyer preference for labeled products) is a reasonable expectation here too, even though this guide found no data yet confirming that effect for JC-STAR specifically.

2026's new piece: cross-border recognition

The detail most worth tracking going into 2027 is that JC-STAR stopped being a purely domestic scheme in 2026. Per secondary reporting, mutual recognition between JC-STAR and Singapore's CLS began on 1 June 2026, and IPA separately introduced application documentation specifically for products already compliant with the UK's PSTI regime, following direct government-to-government cooperation between Japan and the UK. The same reporting is explicit that these arrangements are meant to reduce duplicate documentation and testing, not eliminate market-specific obligations outright — a manufacturer already holding a PSTI statement of compliance or a Singapore CLS label should confirm exactly what IPA's streamlined JC-STAR path does and doesn't waive before assuming full equivalence, since this guide could not find IPA's own published rules spelling out the precise scope of either recognition arrangement.

A workable starting point

  1. Start with STAR-1 if Japan is a target market at allIt is the lowest-friction entry point (self-declaration, baseline requirements aligned to ETSI EN 303 645) and is the level Japan's government procurement is expected to require first.
  2. Budget for Japanese-language documentationAs of this guide's research, applications must be submitted in Japanese — plan for translation or a local partner rather than assuming an English self-assessment will be accepted.
  3. Watch STAR-3 if you make routers or network camerasThose are the first two product categories IPA has published STAR-3 requirements for, and they're also categories that already draw CISA and ENISA attention elsewhere in this guide library.
  4. Check the PSTI/CLS mutual-recognition paths before re-doing work you've already doneIf you already hold a UK PSTI compliance statement or a Singapore CLS label, ask IPA directly what its streamlined documentation path actually requires versus a from-scratch JC-STAR application.
  5. Don't treat JC-STAR as a CRA substituteIt is a Japan-market, IPA-run labeling scheme with no confirmed legal link to the EU Cyber Resilience Act, RED/EN 18031, or any other EU conformity-assessment regime covered elsewhere on this site.

SoftWSP's device and firmware security work produces the vulnerability-handling, update and baseline-hardening evidence that a JC-STAR STAR-1/STAR-2 self-assessment — or a PSTI/CLS label you're trying to carry into Japan — needs as supporting documentation: see Device & Firmware Security.

This guide draws on IPA's own JC-STAR program page and METI's official press release, cross-checked against independent secondary reporting for STAR-3 and international mutual-recognition details not found with the same specificity on IPA's English-language materials. This guide is not a substitute for IPA's own published requirements or for regulatory/legal advice.

Sources

  1. IPA: Japan Cyber-Security Technical Assessment Requirement (JC-STAR) — official program page (administrator, STAR-1 through STAR-4 levels, self-declaration vs third-party assessment, international harmonization)
  2. METI: Launch of IoT Product Security Labeling Scheme (JC-STAR) — official press release (METI policy basis, launch date)
  3. Foresight: Japan Expands JC-STAR IoT Security Labelling With STAR-3 Standards (STAR-3 publication date and scope, Singapore CLS and UK PSTI mutual-recognition details)
  4. IoT M2M Council: Japan launches IoT cyber label scheme (independent secondary reporting on scheme structure and application process)

Frequently asked questions

What is JC-STAR, and who runs it?

JC-STAR — "Labeling Scheme based on Japan Cyber-Security Technical Assessment Requirements" — is a Japanese conformity-labeling scheme for IoT products, administered by Japan's Information-technology Promotion Agency (IPA) per IPA's own program page. It was established under the "IoT Product Security Conformity Assessment Scheme Policy," published by Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) in August 2024, and IPA began accepting applications for the scheme's first level, STAR-1, on 25 March 2025 — a date corroborated by METI's own press release announcing the launch.

What do the STAR-1 through STAR-4 levels actually mean?

Per IPA's own program page, STAR-1 is a unified baseline addressing minimum common threats across all in-scope IoT products, explicitly designed to harmonize with international baselines like ETSI EN 303 645 and NIST's NISTIR 8425. STAR-2 layers category-specific requirements on top of that baseline for particular product types. STAR-1 and STAR-2 both use vendor self-declaration, reviewed and labeled by IPA based on a self-assessment checklist. STAR-3 and STAR-4 are higher levels requiring independent third-party evaluation, aimed at government and critical-infrastructure procurement; per secondary reporting (Foresight), IPA published STAR-3's specific requirements — initially scoped to network devices (such as routers) and network cameras — on 12 June 2026, with STAR-4 still under development as of this guide's research.

Is JC-STAR mandatory for selling IoT products in Japan?

No — it is described as a voluntary labeling scheme, not a product-safety law with a blanket legal mandate, based on this guide's research. Its practical leverage comes from government procurement: secondary reporting indicates Japan intends to require JC-STAR labeling (starting with STAR-1) in government IoT procurement, progressively moving toward higher levels as the STAR-2/3/4 requirement sets mature. A manufacturer not selling to Japanese government buyers is not confirmed to face a legal requirement to hold a JC-STAR label, though the label can still function as a market-trust signal for commercial buyers, similar to the UK's PSTI mark or Singapore's Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme.

Does a JC-STAR label get recognized outside Japan?

Partially, and only through specific bilateral arrangements as of this guide's research — JC-STAR is not a globally harmonized label. Per secondary reporting (Foresight), mutual recognition between JC-STAR and Singapore's Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme (CLS) began on 1 June 2026, and IPA separately introduced application documentation for products already compliant with the UK's Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure (PSTI) regime, following government-to-government cooperation. The same reporting cautions that these arrangements reduce duplicate documentation and testing rather than eliminate market-specific obligations entirely — a manufacturer still needs to confirm what, if anything, each arrangement actually waives before assuming a Singapore CLS or UK PSTI mark alone satisfies JC-STAR, or vice versa.

In this cluster

JC-STAR (Japan IoT security labeling), explained